Synthisophy 527 

Lesson 13: Side Light 4, Chapters 26, 27 and 28:
Side Light 4, Yin and Yang, Upside-down Bell Curve, Review and Thesis 4

Watch Side Light 4 video:
http://www.synthisophy.com/side-light-4.html
Ask students what they think of the conclusions of this video


Watch Upside-down Bell Curve video:
http://www.synthisophy.com/26-upside-down-bell-curve.html

Note in 1994 there is no split in the curve between the Left and the Right, in 2004 we can see a split starting, by 2014 we can see an increase in polarization as the upside-down bell curve shows itself, and by 2017 the upside-down bell curve becomes prominent. This shows us the polarization of the Left and Right and the upside-down bell curve now present in the USA. If a bell curve is considered normal, why do we as a society among the politically active and influential have an upside-down bell curve, is that abnormal?  Why are we so polarized?  The answer lies in the human brain and neurological evolution. It’s in our genes, it’s been in our genes for a very long time: cognitive bias probably developing over the course of late mammalian evolution and present in Australopithecus; to confirmation bias in Homo habilis; to the tribe and argumentative theory, where truth doesn’t matter, winning the argument and gaining power does in Homo erectus; all the while generating the tribal ethos resulting in the warrior ethos that lead Homo sapiens out of Africa 70,000 years ago to dominate the world. Our genetically evolved and present cognitive, confirmation, tribal and argumentative biases shape our polarized perceptions of the world around us, and our warrior ethos finds others of similar mind to battle the opposing party.  Do we have to be this polarized?  Can individual human consciousness be aware of this predisposition and keep it in check, putting value in moderation, reason and truth? Can your neuroreality be neureal and rather than unneural? Ben Franklin addressed that question after the Constitutional Convention: “We’ve given you a republic, can you keep it?” Perhaps if we depolarize, get back to the normal bell curve, become more neureal, and become more centrist as a Nation, the answer will be yes.

Does this argument have any merit?


Watch Yin and Yang video:
http://www.synthisophy.com/27-yin-yang.html

So let’s try and get away from alt-Left and alt-Right polarization, move towards the more rational Center, integrating aspects of both Yin and Yang so our society resembles more the functional tribe from whence we genetically and evolutionarily came.


Watch Review and Thesis 4 video:
http://www.synthisophy.com/28-review-and-thesis-4.html

Review Chapters 20, 23, 24, 25, 26 and 27

Perhaps politics has taken the place of religion, particularly among the unneureal alt-Right and Illiberal-Left. Recall the old adage, never talk about politics or religion?  Thesis 4: Perhaps politics on the alt-Right and illiberal-Left has become their religion.

Discuss Zeynep Tufekci’s conclusion in her article: YouTube, the Great Radicalizer: It seems as if you are never “hard core” enough for YouTube’s recommendation algorithm. It promotes, recommends and disseminates videos in a manner that appears to constantly up the stakes. Given its billion or so users, YouTube may be one of the most powerful radicalizing instruments of the 21st century. This is not because a cabal of YouTube engineers is plotting to drive the world off a cliff. A more likely explanation has to do with the nexus of artificial intelligence and Google’s business model. (YouTube is owned by Google.) For all its lofty rhetoric, Google is an advertising broker, selling our attention to companies that will pay for it. The longer people stay on YouTube, the more money Google makes. What keeps people glued to YouTube? Its algorithm seems to have concluded that people are drawn to content that is more extreme than what they started with — or to incendiary content in general.

This section acts as an introduction to the next Lesson, Chapter 29 and What Can We Do to Depolarize the Nation.

 

Break into groups of 4 for political discussion. Talk about what we covered here today, then talk about any political issues you think are important.  Use the listening skills we discussed.

 

Have someone in each group provide a summary of what they discussed and views expressed.

 

Homework: start thinking about political issues that you are interested in and would like to learn more about, in preparation for your Final Paper.